The ocean is not a resource. It is an economy. It employs 100 million people directly and sustains 600 million more. It moves 90% of world trade by ship. It feeds billions through fisheries and the fastest-growing food production system on earth — aquaculture. It powers coastal tourism that generates $725 billion a year in trade. And it is under pressure from every direction: climate change, overfishing, pollution, underfunding, and the “dark ocean economy” of illegal and unregulated activity that the OECD identifies as a serious structural threat.
OECD — “The Ocean Economy to 2050” (PRIMARY · oecd.org · doi.org/10.1787/a9096fb1-en · March 31, 2025 · OECD Publishing) + UNCTAD (PRIMARY · directly fetched · June 4, 2025)
#5
“If the ocean economy were a country, it would be the fifth largest economy in the world.” — OECD 2025 primary. In 2023, ocean trade reached $2.2 trillion — 7% of world trade. Between 1995 and 2020, it grew 2.5 times, outpacing the global economy’s 1.9-fold growth.
The OECD’s 2025 report, “The Ocean Economy to 2050,” is the most comprehensive assessment of ocean economic trajectories to date. It places the current ocean economy at approximately $2.6 trillion in gross value added — roughly 3-4% of global GDP — while noting that two sectors alone dominate the distribution: “tourism and offshore oil and gas extraction generated about two-thirds of total gross value added.” The remaining third is split among maritime transport, fisheries and aquaculture, shipbuilding, and the fastest-growing new sector, offshore wind. UNCTAD’s June 2025 trade update provides a complementary lens: global ocean trade (goods and services combined) reached $2.2 trillion in 2023, with services ($1.3 trillion) outpacing goods ($900 billion). Tourism led within ocean services at $725 billion — one third of all ocean trade. The ocean economy’s outperformance of global growth from 1995 to 2020 was driven in large part by developing countries, which expanded maritime trade and aquaculture faster than the OECD average. China’s role was decisive: it accounts for the dominant share of global aquaculture output and has been the primary driver of dry bulk maritime trade growth as its manufacturing and construction sectors scaled.
Source: OECD — “The Ocean Economy to 2050” (PRIMARY · directly fetched · oecd.org/en/publications/2025/03/the-ocean-economy-to-2050_e3f6a132.html · doi.org/10.1787/a9096fb1-en · March 31, 2025 · OECD Publishing · KEY VERBATIM: “If the ocean economy were a country, it would be the fifth largest economy in the world” · “Tourism and offshore oil and gas extraction generated about two-thirds of total gross value added” · “Marine and coastal tourism was the largest employer, while offshore oil and gas extraction created high economic output but relatively low employment” · “Output from shipbuilding and offshore wind energy also expanded rapidly albeit from a smaller base” · “could be nearly four times larger by 2050 than in 1995” · “sustained growth and resilience of the ocean economy of the past 25 years is not set to continue” · “national territorial claims expanding to over nearly 39% of the global ocean” · “dark ocean economy” illicit activities) · UNCTAD (PRIMARY · directly fetched · unctad.org/publication/global-trade-update-june-2025-sustainable-ocean-economy · June 4, 2025 · KEY VERBATIM: “Between 1995 and 2020, the ocean economy grew 2.5 times, outpacing the 1.9-fold growth of the global economy. Developing countries drove much of this expansion” · “In 2023, global ocean trade reached $2.2 trillion – $1.3 trillion in services and $900 billion in goods. It made up about 7% of world trade” · “Tourism led the way, generating $725 billion, or one third of all ocean trade”)
“Between 1995 and 2020, the ocean economy grew 2.5 times, outpacing the 1.9-fold growth of the global economy. Developing countries drove much of this expansion.”
— UNCTAD — “Global Trade Update June 2025: Sustainable ocean economy” (PRIMARY · unctad.org · directly fetched · June 4, 2025 · UN Trade and Development)
The Aquaculture Revolution — Wild Capture Plateaued, Farmed Surged
One of the most significant structural shifts in the global ocean economy happened almost without public notice. Wild fish capture — the kind involving boats and nets and open seas — has barely moved in 30 years. It held steady at roughly 90 million tonnes since the 1990s, a plateau driven by depleted fish stocks and fishing capacity limits. But global demand for seafood kept growing. The gap was filled by aquaculture. From 22 million tonnes in the early 1990s to 94 million tonnes in 2022 — more than a four-fold increase. Today, farmed seafood accounts for more than half of all aquatic animal production globally, and 57% of all aquatic food consumed. This shift from wild to farmed is the defining transition of ocean food economics in the 21st century, and it is almost entirely an Asian story: China and a small group of Asian nations account for roughly 90% of global aquaculture output.
Why it matters: aquaculture’s rise means that the future of seafood supply is not about how many fish are in the sea — it is about investment in farming infrastructure, water quality management, feed supply chains, and disease control in coastal environments. These are industrial and policy challenges, not just ecological ones. UNCTAD notes demand is also rising for seaweed-based plastics and non-fossil marine materials, opening entirely new markets at the frontier of aquaculture.
UNCTAD — “Global Trade Update June 2025: Sustainable ocean economy” (PRIMARY · unctad.org · directly fetched · June 4, 2025) + OECD (PRIMARY · March 2025)
94M t
“Aquaculture, by contrast, has surged from 22 million to 94 million tonnes in 2022. It now accounts for over half of aquatic animal production and 57% of aquatic food consumed globally.” — UNCTAD primary verbatim. Wild capture has “held steady at about 90 million tonnes” since the 1990s. “Overfished stocks and rising demand are shifting the sector from wild capture to aquaculture.”
The aquaculture transition is more than a production story — it is a geopolitical shift in ocean economic power. Because China and a handful of Asian economies dominate aquaculture output, the centre of gravity of the global seafood supply chain has permanently moved east. This has implications for trade flows (most farmed seafood is traded internationally), for food security in import-dependent nations, and for the value chains of developing economies that rely on wild fisheries exports. UNCTAD’s 2025 report also flags a new competitive pressure: US tariffs on fisheries imports, introduced in 2025, “pose challenges for countries that depend on the US market.” Mexico and Canada are most exposed, with partial protection from USMCA rules of origin. The tariff overlay on an already-strained wild fisheries sector adds further uncertainty for LDC coastal economies that depend on seafood exports for foreign exchange earnings. Innovation is moving faster than governance: seaweed-based plastics and non-fossil marine materials are “gaining ground” as new export categories for coastal and island economies — a potential avenue for diversification beyond fish.
Source: UNCTAD — “Global Trade Update June 2025: Sustainable ocean economy” (PRIMARY · directly fetched · unctad.org · June 4, 2025 · KEY VERBATIM: “Overfished stocks and rising demand are shifting the sector from wild capture to aquaculture” · “Since the 1990s, wild capture has held steady at about 90 million tonnes” · “Aquaculture, by contrast, has surged from 22 million to 94 million tonnes in 2022. It now accounts for over half of aquatic animal production and 57% of aquatic food consumed globally” · “Demand is also growing for sustainable marine materials. Seaweed-based plastics and other non-fossil alternatives are gaining ground” · “New United States tariffs on fisheries imports pose challenges for countries that depend on the US market” · Mexico and Canada “most exposed”)
The $2.4 Billion Problem in a $2.8 Trillion Gap
The ocean economy is the fifth largest in the world and growing. But the investment needed to sustain, decarbonise, and fairly distribute that growth is nowhere close to materialising. Ocean-related aid reached just $2.4 billion in 2022 — far below what is needed to meet the SDG 14 targets for life below water. UNCTAD has put a number to the need: a $2.8 trillion “Blue Deal” to fund mangrove restoration and conservation, decarbonisation of shipping and fisheries, sustainable ocean production, and coastal and offshore wind energy. The contrast is stark: $2.4 billion in aid against a $2.8 trillion need. The OECD’s “Ocean Economy to 2050” is equally direct: the “sustained growth and resilience of the ocean economy of the past 25 years is not set to continue.” “Various forces could slow or even reverse growth by 2050 if no policy actions are taken.” And the OECD explicitly identifies a “dark ocean economy” — illicit and harmful activities including illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing — as a structural problem that undermines the legitimate ocean economy from within. The ocean could be nearly four times larger by 2050 than it was in 1995. Whether it reaches that potential depends entirely on decisions made in this decade.
Why it matters: the ocean economy’s most extreme geography is its inequality of outcomes. Small island developing states — the countries most dependent on ocean economies and most vulnerable to ocean climate threats — are receiving the least investment. Countries with vast coastlines and no infrastructure to exploit them face ocean trade deficits across every category. The Blue Deal framing by UNCTAD is not a development aid appeal. It is a recognition that the ocean economy’s growth model is not self-sustaining without large-scale structural investment.
UNCTAD (PRIMARY · directly fetched · June 4, 2025) + OECD (PRIMARY · March 31, 2025)
$2.4B
“Ocean-related aid reached just $2.4 billion in 2022 – far below what’s needed to meet global goals.” — UNCTAD primary verbatim. UNCTAD calls for a “$2.8 trillion Blue Deal.” OECD: “sustained growth and resilience of the ocean economy of the past 25 years is not set to continue.” “Various forces could slow or even reverse growth by 2050 if no policy actions are taken.”
The ocean economy’s finance gap is not a rounding error. It is structural. The $2.4 billion in ocean-related official development assistance in 2022 compares to a $2.8 trillion Blue Deal requirement — a ratio of 1:1,167. Even accounting for private finance and domestic investment, the gap is enormous. UNCTAD identifies four priority areas for the Blue Deal: mangrove conservation and restoration (which provides coastal protection, carbon sequestration, and fishery nurseries); decarbonisation of shipping and fisheries (shipping accounts for approximately 2.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions and is under increasing regulatory pressure); sustainable ocean-based production (aquaculture, seaweed, marine biotechnology); and coastal and offshore wind energy. The OECD adds a further dimension: the need to combat the “dark ocean economy” — illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing that depletes stocks that legitimate operators depend on, along with sea-based drug trafficking and other illicit activities that undermine ocean governance. The “dark” and legitimate ocean economies compete for the same waters, the same fish stocks, and the same governance attention. Failure to address the dark economy is itself a constraint on the blue economy’s growth potential. Without urgent investment — in governance, in decarbonisation, in adaptation, and in the development of blue financial markets — the OECD warns the ocean economy risks losing the growth momentum that made it the world’s fifth largest economy.
Source: UNCTAD (PRIMARY · directly fetched · unctad.org · June 4, 2025 · KEY VERBATIM: “Ocean-related aid reached just $2.4 billion in 2022 – far below what’s needed to meet global goals” · “UN Trade and Development is calling for a $2.8 trillion ‘Blue Deal’ to fund mangrove conservation and restoration, decarbonisation of shipping and fisheries, sustainable ocean-based production, and coastal and offshore wind energy” · “Without urgent investment, the ocean economy risks falling short of its potential to deliver sustainable growth and achieve Sustainable Development Goal 14” · “About 600 million people rely on the ocean economy. It supports 100 million jobs, mainly in fisheries, aquaculture and tourism”) · OECD (PRIMARY · doi.org/10.1787/a9096fb1-en · March 31, 2025 · KEY VERBATIM: “sustained growth and resilience of the ocean economy of the past 25 years is not set to continue” · “climate change, environmental degradation, lagging productivity, and slow digital transformation are intensifying pressures on marine ecosystems and economic potential” · “could be nearly four times larger by 2050 than in 1995” · “various forces could slow or even reverse growth by 2050 if no policy actions are taken” · “dark ocean economy” illicit activities including illegal fishing · “national territorial claims expanding to over nearly 39% of the global ocean”)