Home AI Technology Gaming Future Economy Geography Automobile Science Web Stories

Compared: The Global Gender Pay Gap

Macro Discovery
On: September 9, 2026 6:53 AM
Follow Us:
A split ledger of pay. Women earn about 18% less, the amber figure. The gap has narrowed by two points in a decade. A note separates this from the 52-cent labour-income ratio. Gender Pay Gap
A split ledger of pay. Women earn about 18% less, the amber figure. The gap has narrowed by two points in a decade. A note separates this from the 52-cent labour-income ratio. Gender Pay Gap
Compared: The Global Gender Pay Gap | Macro Discovery
Compared · Pay · ILO

The Global Gender Pay Gap

The global gender pay gap. One number, every country.

The 52-cent figure is all labour income. The 18% gap is an unadjusted earnings average. The 68.8% score is an index, not a wage.

52¢Labour income per $1 · ILO 2025
18%Unadjusted earnings gap · ILO 2026
68.8%Forum index closed · not a wage

Three numbers

  • 52 cents — women’s labour income per dollar of men’s in 2025. Includes hours and who works. Source: ILO.
  • About 18% — women earn less than men on the ILO’s global earnings estimate, narrowed by two points since 2018. Source: ILO, September 2026.
  • 68.8% — share of the World Economic Forum gender-gap index closed in 2025. Education, health, politics, and work. Not a wage. Source: World Economic Forum.

What the data shows

A common claim is that the global gender pay gap is one number, and that it is the gap for the same job. The fact is that the two ILO figures in circulation are different counts. In 2025 the ILO said women earned 52 cents for every dollar of labour income earned by men. Labour income is all pay from work. It includes who has a job, how many hours, and self-employment. A woman who is not in paid work pulls that average down. It is a real gap in income. It is not a quote for the same hour.

The earnings gap is the other number. ILO estimates released on 18 September 2026 put women at about 18% less than men globally, narrowed by two percentage points since the 2018 estimates. High-income countries narrowed by about 2.5 points over the decade, lower-middle-income countries by about two, upper-middle-income by about one. At about 0.2 point a year, the ILO called a close distant. The hourly series behind country charts is unadjusted. It compares average earnings of employees and does not hold education, experience, or occupation fixed. It leaves out the self-employed. A like-for-like gap is smaller than 18%, and it is not the 52-cent figure.

A third number is not a wage at all. The World Economic Forum’s 2025 index was 68.8% closed, the fastest annual gain since the pandemic, with full parity estimated at 123 years on that pace. The index mixes economic participation, education, health, and politics. Education and health were already above 95%. Women were 41.2% of the workforce and 28.8% of top leadership. Iceland was first, at 92.6%. Using 68.8% as the pay gap, or 52 cents as equal pay for equal work, swaps a composite and an income total for a wage.

Women’s pay per men’s dollar · two ILO counts
Labour income 52¢ Earnings 82¢ 82 cents is 100 minus the 18% earnings gap. Scale: $1 = full bar. Source: ILO.

The 68.8% Forum score is not on this chart. It is an index, not a wage.

CountFigureWhat it is
Labour income, 202552 centsAll pay from work. Includes hours
Earnings gap, 2026about 18%Unadjusted. Down 2 points since 2018
Implied earnings82 centsNot the 52-cent count
Forum index, 202568.8% closedFour dimensions. Not a wage
Top leadership28.8%Women. Workforce share 41.2%

How it was measured

Labour income divides total pay from work. A lower employment rate or shorter week lowers the cents without a lower hourly rate. The earnings gap is the difference in average earnings as a share of men’s. The hourly version on country charts is unadjusted and covers employees only. National surveys differ, so a cross-country rank is rough.

The Forum index scores parity from 0 to 100 across four subindexes. A 68.8% close is not 68.8 cents on the dollar. The 123-year line assumes the latest pace holds. It is a projection of an index, not a payroll.

What it means

It is settled that ILO labour income in 2025 was 52 cents, that the earnings gap is about 18% and unadjusted, and that the Forum index was 68.8% closed. It is not settled that any of these is the gap for the same job. Use 52 cents for labour income. Use 18% for the unadjusted earnings gap. Use 68.8% only as the index. Do not swap them.

Common misreadings

  • 52 cents is all labour income. It is not the same hour in the same job.
  • 18% is an unadjusted average. It does not hold occupation fixed.
  • 68.8% is a four-part index. It is not a wage.

Where the numbers come from

International Labour Organization Primary · 2025
Labour income
Women earned 52 cents for every dollar of labour income earned by men in 2025. Includes hours and participation, not a like-for-like wage.
View →
International Labour Organization Primary · 2026
Global earnings gap
About 18% less, narrowed by two points since 2018. About 0.2 point a year. Hourly country series is unadjusted and covers employees only.
View →
World Economic Forum Index · 2025
Global Gender Gap Report
68.8% closed. Full parity estimated at 123 years. Women 41.2% of the workforce and 28.8% of top leadership. Not a pay gap.
View →

How we built this

  • Dataset: ILO labour-income ratio; ILO 2026 earnings estimate; World Economic Forum 2025 index.
  • Scope: The three counts kept apart. No like-for-like gap invented.
  • Figures: 52 cents is labour income. 18% is the unadjusted earnings gap. 68.8% is the index. They are not swapped.

Common questions

Do women earn 52 cents for every dollar men earn?
On labour income, yes, in the ILO’s 2025 figure. That count is all pay from work, so it includes who has a job, how many hours, and self-employment. It is not the gap for the same hour in the same job. The ILO’s separate earnings estimate, released in September 2026, is about 18% less for women, narrowed by two points since 2018.
Is the 18% gap equal pay for equal work?
No. The ILO hourly series is unadjusted. It compares average earnings of men and women employees and does not hold education, experience, or occupation fixed. It also leaves out the self-employed. A like-for-like gap is smaller than the raw average, and it is not this 18%.
Is the World Economic Forum score a pay gap?
No. The 2025 Global Gender Gap Index was 68.8% closed, with full parity estimated at 123 years. It mixes economic participation, education, health, and politics. Women were 41.2% of the workforce and 28.8% of top leadership. That is a composite, not a wage.

Same topic cluster

Macro Discovery

Sukh Dhaliwal

Sukh Dhaliwal is the founder of Macro Discovery, an independent digital publication covering AI, technology, science, future trends, and global innovation through visual storytelling and data-driven analysis.

Join WhatsApp

Join Now

Join Facebook

Follow us

Leave a Comment